Oh,
lordy, here we go again:
''BOY SUSPENDED FOR POINTING
CHICKEN FINGER''
''JONESBORO, Ark., Jan. 31 (AP) -- An 8-year-old boy was suspended
from school for 3 days after pointing a breaded chicken finger
at a teacher and saying, 'Pow, pow, pow.' ''
''The incident apparently violated the Jonesboro School District's
zero-tolerance policy against weapons.
''Kelli Kissinger, mother of first-grader Christopher, said she
believed the
punishment was too severe.
'' 'I think a chicken strip is something insignificant,' she
said. 'It's just a piece of chicken. How could you play
like it's a gun?'' '
Okay, now, I know I'm a city boy but I think I do know something
about the gross anatomy of a chicken, and for the life of me
I have never heard of one with fingers. But even so, it just
doesn't sound terribly dangerous. Certainly not as dangerous
as, say, a drumstick.
Sigh. All right. You know the drill. Everybody stand up and repeat
after me:
AK-47 machine gun -- weapon.
Ham sandwich -- not a weapon.
Switchblade -- weapon.
Library paste -- not a weapon.
Hand grenade -- weapon.
''Hello, Kitty'' barrette -- not a weapon.
Smith & Wesson .38 Special -- weapon.
Chicken finger -- NOT A WEAPON!
For Heaven's sake. How many times must we do the Zero-Tolerance
Tango before somebody cries ''enough!''
According to my records, over the past year or two we have seen
children suspended and even expelled for bringing to school:
A sword-shaped cocktail toothpick. A tiny plastic pistol borrowed
from a G.I. Joe doll. Even one kid's own thumb and forefinger,
after he used it as a pretend six-shooter in a playground cowboys-and-Indigenous-Peoples
game. And that's just barely scratching the surface.
In this latest case, South Elementary School principal Dan Sullivan
said the school has zero-tolerance rules because the Jonesboro
public wants them. This is, after all, the same town where four
students and a teacher were killed and 10 others wounded three
years ago when two youths opened fire on a middle school campus.
That was a tragedy. So was Columbine. So it is every time some
nut case opens fire on a school, a factory floor, an office,
or the White House. And it would be imprudent to ignore the potential
of disturbed people bringing their internal demons into our schools
and workplaces.
But we can't let prudence give way to hysteria. Neither Columbine
nor the Jonesboro tragedies involved chicken parts or cocktail
picks, nor did the perps breach school security, or wreak their
havoc with ''might-could-possibly-be weapons.'' They were packing
serious iron and they came in shooting. No metal detector or
backpack search or zero-tolerance rule could have made a whit
of a difference in either case.
Suspending a first-grader for playing with his lunch, in hopes
of giving potential homicidal maniacs second thoughts, would
be laughable -- were it not for the fact that a child is being
denied three days of public education for which Arkansas taxpayers
have already paid.
Not to mention the ridicule and shame that child will suffer,
and never really understand why.
You've got to wonder if turning an uncomprehending 8-year-old
into a criminal in the name of ''zero tolerance'' isn't just
sowing the seeds of hostility and low self-esteem that could
put another Columbine on the map a few years hence. |
|